<< Back to Part 1: The Challenge
Those with an over-inflated sense of entitlement will be the last to seriously consider the libertarian argument. I would not consider any of the alleged “solved problems” on Austin Cline’s list to be fundamental human rights. Many are outright luxuries. This is seems to me to be true of state parks and parks in cities. As much as we all love green leafy, open spaces in cities nobody is entitled them, and I think we can live without them.
I would love to know how rural Americans feel about this issue. I’ve been a city dweller all my life. Much of the ground I come into contact with is covered either with a building or with some sort of stone, concrete, or asphalt surface. I understand why some city dwellers get hopped up about keeping certain spaces green and open. But what about those who sit on their porches and see nothing but green, rolling hills extending all the way to the horizon. Are they as concerned as we city dwellers are about public parks?
Continue reading ‘How Libertarians Deal With “the Problems of the 1890s”, Part 2: Public Parks’


![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)



